Thursday, November 7, 2013

us healthcare

The movie Sicko is yet an separate attempt by Michael Moore to kitchen stave kayoed to the collective soul of America and possibly make verboten down the world, to expose certain truths about controversial issues which in this outcome happens to be the U.S. healthcare system. Some may c entirely(prenominal) his opinions and movies propaganda or cardinal-sided and have a biased point of invite further I believe he puts forth a valid argument comparing our healthcare system to that of new(prenominal) countries. The countries he visited in the movie such as Canada, France and Cuba all have universal healthcare systems which are controlled by the boldness whereas ours are controlled by what seems to be greedy redress companies out to acquire insanely bloated profits. The movie portrays how indemnity companies pay away key politicians to survive along certain bills in sexual congress to protect their bottom line and eventually those very same(p) politicians mo ve into the private sector within the healthcare industry, a recitation that seemed to have originated during the Nixon administration according to the movie. There were sundry(a) things that did surprise me in the movie and that I was kind of interpreted aback by, but the singular thing that surprised me the to the highest degree was how often the insurance companies made use of the word observational.
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
It seemed as if that peculiar(prenominal) word was tied to each and every denial in the movie, in the end contributing to the insurance companies sole quarry of saving themselves large amounts of money. On e example in situation that caught my atte! ntion, which happens to be at the beginning of the movie, was the character of Doug Noes teensy-weensy girl who was going deaf in both ears by the age of nine months. As furthest as their insurance company CIGNA was concerned, they would only approve one cochlear graft for the left ear but claimed to approve implants for both ears would be experimental. Only one doubt comes to my mind and that is, huh? That makes no sense whatsoever. I just cannot lift my mind about the logic...If you want to get a bountiful essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment