Tuesday, January 15, 2019

Fat Chance for the “Fat Tax”

Fat Chance for the Fat Tax Our bodies and what we put into them is our stimulate melodic line unless someone else is harmed in the process. I flock understand a revenue on drinkers and smokers because drinkers can harm others when they get behind the wheel of a car, and secondhand smoke is a killer of umpteen, exclusively a value on what deal eat is preposterous. People argon put away expiry to eat junk food no matter what the cost is boldness at smoking, the pr icing the puck of cig atomic number 18ttes keeps going up but mass play along to buy them.People already know that junk food is bad for them, but again and again they resort bandaging to it because of the taste. We can non depend on our political relation to encourage us with every intimacy, we postulate to be independent and learn from our own mistakes, its the lone(prenominal) way we go away grow as a society. The fat value would non work because it would garner the poor turn over more of their alread y limited income, quite a little would salvage go back to junk food time after time, and fleshiness is a dilemma that would non be lick by a sincere revenue enhancement. obesity and poverty go hand in hand junk foods ar cheap so the poor continue to buy them.By placing this assess we would be valuateing the nation who couldnt afford it. Even good deal that atomic number 18 not obese would be affected by the levy, people analogous the taste of junk foods whether they ar overweight or not. The poor would only end up poorer if the tax was set because even if they did stop buying junk foods, they would still have to pay more money for a hefty alternative. The tax could possibly end up making us a fitter nation possibly but one thing for sure is it would definitely devote us a poorer nation.Alan Maryon-Davis, President of the UK stave of Public Health stated that, The downside of the tax is that its regressive in terms of it would hit the poorest hardest, and in the c urrent climate when people are struggling to make a living, its a difficult balance. Establishing this tax could excessively lead to job cuts at corporations that have popular products that are considered unhealthy. To set a tax during a time when the economy is not up doesnt seem to be a good bringing close together any way you look at it we will be pickings more money out of peoples pockets.People prefer chips, luxuriant food burgers, and fries over healthier things much(prenominal) as fruits, vegetables, and organic fertilizer foods so paying an extra . 20 or . 30 cents is not going to compound their mind on what they like to eat. People baron grumble about paying the extra money, but they will still dish it out in the end. If it were a four or quintuplet dollar tax then it would probably change their mind, but in that respect would be some very angry citizens. Fatty foods will still be less expensive then healthier foods even if the tax was imposed.People are still go ing to do what they like to stubs and alcohol are already taxed but people continue to smoke and drink, so how people think a tax on junk foods will change the way people eat is beyond me. Citizens should not look to the administration to tell them what they should eat they should be able to choose by themselves. The tax will either be too large for citizens to accept and they will get angry, or it will be too small for people to really care there doesnt really seem to be a happy medium. The June 2005 issue of The American Journal of Clinical fodder describes this in the article. Overweight or obesity (BMI 25) was 29% among both semivegetarians and vegans, and 25% among lactovegetarians. For them, vegetarian and vegan foods are fattening. Should they be taxed? (Satin). This seems to raise a very good question. Should people that are eating healthy but still seem to not be able to keep the weight off be taxed also? We should start using our time to spread healthy eating habits e nd-to-end the country instead of taxing things when they get out of hand.Obesity it not a problem that can be solved by a simple tax just like smoking and drinking were not solved by taxes. If you take this matter as far as the restraint went then there would be people hiding out in places sneaking junk food around. William Saletan makes a good point in saying, If you want to tax the hell out of soda, you need to make people think its a drug, not a beverage that bolt down a Coke is like puffing on a cigarette (Engber). If you want people to stop eating junk foods then you need to show them how bad they are, taxing them wont help.Education on healthy eating habits and exercise would help the obesity epidemic more the tax would. Starting a fat tax would also form the tactile sensation that the U. S. society is against overweight people, which could form insecurities for overweight people, and possibly be considered discrimination. The modify of the tax might show a decline in obe sity, plot it could also possibly show a rise in diseases such as anorexia and bulimia. People would get uncomfortable about being overweight, perchance even to the point of depression.The tax could show a decline in obesity over many years, and the money generated from the tax could also help stimulate some of the anti-obesity organizations. The money could also be used to mop up health care, medical research, or any other number of upright things. It might stimulate some people to start eating healthier and exercising more. Children might be fed healthier and down the road, in a couple generations, the obesity rate would drop. Even though people would still mostly likely buy junk foods it still might cut down on the over-eating of them.Denmark has already started to impose the fat tax and it will be fully done so in 2019. I still dont buy it. The fat tax is a concept that should be thrown out the window. There are many other ways we can try to rid obesity we could make companie s state (in larger print) clearly what the shopper is buying when they look at the product, make healthy eating habits and exercise a bigger part of our childrens schooling, and inform citizens on the better choice of eating healthy and what it can do to help you. These are easy ways to help obesity prevention without taking money out of the pockets of our citizens. America is a discontinue country and citizens should have a right to choose what they can and cannot eat.Works Cited Engber, Daniel. allow Them Drink Water What a fat tax really mode for America. Slate. 21 September 2009. Article. 19 November 2010. Satin, Mort. Fat tax falls flat. saltinstitute. salt Institute. 29 July 2009. Web. 20 November 2010. Wilkins, Rebecca. Danes impose 25% tax increases on ice cream, chocolate, and sweets to curb disease. bmj. BMJ. 6 July 2010. Web. 20 November 2010.

No comments:

Post a Comment