Plessy vs. Ferguson :: essays research papers

Plessy vs.FergusonThe contingency of Plessy vs. Ferguson started when a 30-year-old colored shoemaker named Homer Plessy was put in imprison for sitting in the white car of the East Louisiana sandbag on June 7, 1892. Even though Plessy was only one-eighths cutting and seven-eighths white, he was considered black by Louisiana law. Plessy didnt like this idea, and so he went to chat up and argued in the grounds of Homer Adolph Plessy v. The State of Lousiana that the Separate Car Act, which squeeze segregation of train cars, violated the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution. The Thirteenth Amendment was make in order to abolish slavery, while the object of the Fourteenth Amendment was to go through and through the absolute equality of the two races before the law. The name of Ferguson was given to the case because the judge at the trial was named John Howard Ferguson. Judge Ferguson had previously state that the Separate Car Act was unconstitutional on tra ins that traveled through several states, but he ruled that within the state, the state regimen could choose to regulate the railroad companies that operate within their respective state. The persuasion was that the judge found Plessy guilty of refusing to leave the white car. Plessy proceeded to appeal to the ultimate Court of Louisiana, which also found him guilty. In 1896, the Supreme Court of the get together States heard Plessys case and found him guilty once again.My beguile on this particular case sides with Plessy rather than Ferguson. I believe in total equality and the idea of no difference between young buck human beings. There should be no distinction made between that which is for the white man, and that which is for the black man.